In the corporate landscape, there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that question the values of an organization . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , exemplifies this type of scenario — a tale of presumed malfeasance that not only taints the reputation of a single manager but calls into question over the enterprise’s integrity.

Despite a range of troubling accusations , Collins has held onto his title , visibly unaffected by the turmoil enveloping him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? Based on insider information , Collins’ history of inappropriate actions began with breaches of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it didn’t conclude at that point . Instead, it transformed into a cascade of dubious behaviors that has left fellow employees demoralized and customers perplexed.

While attending a professional growth course — supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a professional opportunity into a spree of inappropriate episodes . Insiders suggest he spent organization-paid excursions pursuing romantic liaisons , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his family remained uninformed .

But the ethical breaches didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a blatant abuse of professional tools and a violation of confidentiality . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to transmit inappropriate content —including symbols celebrating indiscretions—paints a picture of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these digital overtures , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in physical relationships with an employee on numerous occurrences during work time , despite his being married and her having a spouse . This obvious misappropriation of company time and David Collins resources contravened corporate etiquette but led to familial breakdowns — producing a wake of personal ruin that extended past the workplace .

What reason can this Ventia Kerikeri behavior be enabled to go on? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still in a position of power at Ventia? The response , it appears, lies in a concerning absence of supervision within the business. Issues have been raised , yet Collins continues unchecked .

This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that status and power within the firm can protect individuals from consequences . It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , disheartens staff , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .